It's bad enough trying to keep people's attention when the competition is famous people, and beautiful ones. We're divorced enough from the world already without putting a heads-up display between us and it. Look around you when you're next on public transport, or in the pub, or in the park: endless people Tweeting and Facebooking and Song Popping, oblivious to their surroundings. The Apple iGlass augmented reality glasses are all but confirmed at this point, and were beginning to see what the futuristic, first-generation wearable could look like. The Apple Glasses augmented reality glasses are all but confirmed at this point, and were beginning to see what the futuristic, first-generation wearable co. For all the benefits, I think sticking a screen in front of our eyes is a step too far in the wrong direction. Fawn Creek Civil Rights Lawyers represent clients who have been illegally discriminated against on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability and national origin. My worry isn't the tech, the Big Brother aspect ("Record every moment of your waking life for data mining, police analysis and the future amusement of unspecified third parties? Allow/ Don't Allow") or even the price. I don't doubt that if Apple made high-tech specs, they'd be the most beautifully designed high-tech specs imaginable. Instead of peering at a screen, you'd peer through one. It would be a display for your head, with notifications that floated above your nose, and icons that floated in front of your eyes.
Imagine: an Apple version of Google's Project Glass.
And while we don't know exactly what Apple's been up to, we do know what its archrival Google is doing with head-mounted displays.
0 kommentar(er)
